A close look at the spatial structure implied by the CAR and SAR models
✍ Scribed by Melanie M. Wall
- Book ID
- 104339873
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 470 KB
- Volume
- 121
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0378-3758
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Modeling spatial interactions that arise in spatially referenced data is commonly done by incorporating the spatial dependence into the covariance structure either explicitly or implicitly via an autoregressive model. In the case of lattice (regional summary) data, two common autoregressive models used are the conditional autoregressive model (CAR) and the simultaneously autoregressive model (SAR). Both of these models produce spatial dependence in the covariance structure as a function of a neighbor matrix W and often a ÿxed unknown spatial correlation parameter. This paper examines in detail the correlation structures implied by these models as applied to an irregular lattice in an attempt to demonstrate their many counterintuitive or impractical results. A data example is used for illustration where US statewide average SAT verbal scores are modeled and examined for spatial structure using di erent spatial models.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The note by Feldstein and Robinson (hereafter referred to as FR) raises two questions. The first is whether the EOF1 of zonal wind in the numerical integrations that we carried out is correlated with the atmospheric angular velocity or with the mean angular momentum. The second is wheth
## Abstract James and James (1992) examine internally generated interannual variability in a multi‐level primitive‐equation model. The authors claim that the variability in the global mean relative angular velocity is associated with fluctuations in the mid‐latitude zonally‐averaged zonal winds. We