๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A classification system for faecal incontinence based on anorectal investigations

โœ Scribed by D. K. Thekkinkattil; M. Lim; S. G. Stojkovic; P. J. Finan; P. M. Sagar; D. Burke


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
118 KB
Volume
95
Category
Article
ISSN
0007-1323

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

Background

Faecal incontinence is a socially disabling condition that affects a heterogeneous population of patients. There is no standardization of investigations, and treatment outcomes are variable. The major limitation for comparing the results from different studies is the lack of a pretreatment classification of incontinence. The aim of this study was to review the anorectal investigation findings and propose a simple, repeatable classification for faecal incontinence.

Methods

Patients who had anorectal investigations for defaecatory disorders from February 2000 to September 2006 were analysed retrospectively. All patients had anorectal manometry, anal mucosal electrosensitivity testing and endoanal ultrasonography.

Results

Of a total of 1294 patients, 135 were excluded, leaving 1159 (460 continent and 699 incontinent) for analysis. The patients were divided into four groups: traumatic incontinence, neuropathic faecal incontinence, combined faecal incontinence and idiopathic faecal incontinence. The manometric variables and demographics were distinct in these groups.

Conclusion

Patients with faecal incontinence can be classified into different groups with distinct pathophysiological variables. Such a classification system will enable comparison and interpretation of the outcomes of different studies and also help in the selection of patients for appropriate treatments.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A revised classification system for Brit
โœ N.T.H. Holmes; P.J. Boon; T.A. Rowell ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 306 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

This paper describes a classification of British rivers based on their aquatic plant communities, and represents a revision of an earlier version published in the early 1980s. 2. Data on macrophytes from 459 riverine sites were added to the original database of 1055 sites, and analysed using TWINSP