✦ LIBER ✦

A class of multidimensional IRT models for testing unidimensionality and clustering items

✍ Scribed by Francesco Bartolucci

Publisher: Springer
Year: 2007
Tongue: English
Weight: 302 KB
Volume: 72
Category: Article
ISSN: 0033-3123
DOI: 10.1007/s11336-005-1376-9

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Having a fit: impact of number of items

Having a fit: impact of number of items and distribution of data on traditional criteria for assessing IRT’s unidimensionality assumption

✍ Karon F. Cook; Michael A. Kallen; Dagmar Amtmann 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 261 KB

Estimation and test of linearity for a c

Estimation and test of linearity for a class of additive nonlinear models

✍ Nathalie Chèze-Payaud; Jean-Michel Poggi; Bruno Portier 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 619 KB

This paper deals with the estimation and the test for linearity of models belonging to a class of additive nonlinear ones. We prove the joint asymptotic normality for a kernel estimator and provide a test for linearity of each function defining the model.

On the correspondence between population

On the correspondence between population-averaged models and a class of cluster-specific models for correlated binary data

✍ Andreas I. Sashegyi; K.Stephen Brown; Patrick J. Farrell 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 208 KB

The relationship between marginal (population-averaged) models for cluster-correlated binary data, and a class of cluster-speciÿc, logistic-normal random e ects models is discussed. We show that random e ects models can accomplish the same end as a more direct modelling of intra-cluster correlation,

093053 (E12) An experimental test of a g

093053 (E12) An experimental test of a general class of utility models: Evidence for context dependency : Chechile R.A., Cooke A.D.J., Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Volume 14, Number 1, 1997, pp. 75–93

📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 93 KB

Three reasons for why people may evaluate utility in a rank-dependent fashion have been suggested: (a) rank-dependent weighting is a function of perceptual biases and thus not prescriptively defensible; (b) weights are (re)distributed by motivational processes that reflect stable personality charact