๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A case study on the costs and the fuel consumption of harvesting, transporting, and chipping chains for logging residues in Japan

โœ Scribed by Takuyuki Yoshioka; Kazuhiro Aruga; Toshio Nitami; Hideo Sakai; Hiroshi Kobayashi


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
323 KB
Volume
30
Category
Article
ISSN
0961-9534

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The objective of this study is to examine the feasibility of a harvesting and transporting system for logging residues including the cost, energy, and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) effectiveness of fossil energy substitution with logging residues in Japan. ''A harvesting and transporting system for logging residues'' was constructed with reference to some European countries, where the utilization of bioenergy is making steady progress, and examined based on field experiments in Japanese forestry. The feasibility of the system was discussed from the standpoints of cost, energy, and CO 2 , and the system was compared with those of European countries. Concerning the system, it is desirable that the process of chipper comminuting should be incorporated into the system as early as possible. Although such a system is not particularly feasible in Japan from the standpoint of cost, it is suggested that it should be possible for Japan to reduce the domestic CO 2 emissions by utilizing logging residues as alternative energy resources. A comparison with the European countries and a preliminary sensitivity analysis to the system demonstrate that the technical development to reduce the total cost, e.g., improving the forwarding and transporting efficiency, is essential for realizing bioenergy utilization in Japan.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The economics of harvesting and transpor
โœ Daniel Ryan Petrolia ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2008 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 535 KB

Corn-stover feedstock costs were estimated for a proposed biomass-to-ethanol conversion facility in southern Minnesota, USA, accounting for county-specific yields and transportation distances, erosion constraints, machinery specifications, and transportation, storage, and densification costs. Monte