## BACKGROUND. A small sample size, a high rate of exclusions, inadequate follow-up in different settings, and a lack of comparison with previous levels of analgesia have recently been reported to be the principal limitations of the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines regarding cancer pain.
A brief pain diary for ambulatory patients with advanced cancer : Acceptability and validity
✍ Scribed by Elizabeth Maunsell; Pierre Allard; Michel Dorval; Johanne Labbé
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 140 KB
- Volume
- 88
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Background:
Undertreatment of pain is common among ambulatory patients with advanced cancer. available pain assessment tools are complex and not easy to use in ambulatory care settings.
Methods:
The authors developed and assessed the acceptability and psychometric properties of a simple, brief 4-week pain diary for ambulatory care assessing 3 indicators: current pain intensity on rising and retiring, number of daily rescue doses, and weekly impact of pain on quality of life. selected european organization for research and treatment (eortc) quality of life questionnaire subscales were administered once concurrently for validation purposes. subjects were 98 adult french-speaking ambulatory patients with advanced cancers who were on opioids, free of apparent cognitive impairment, and recruited through 2 oncology clinics in quebec city, quebec, canada.
Results:
In the first 3 weeks, > or =80% of patients completed all requested diary data. internal consistencies of the 5-item scale assessing pain impact on quality of life were 0.87-0.92 over the study period. pain intensity predicted both increased use of rescue doses and negative pain impact on quality of life. this latter scale was also responsive to decreases in pain intensity over 1-week intervals. as hypothesized, pain intensity, rescue doses, and pain impact on quality of life correlated with eortc scale scores. pain intensity correlated most strongly with the eortc pain and global quality of life scales (r = 0.65 and -0.55, respectively).
Conclusions:
This diary is simple, very brief, acceptable to patients, and appears to be valid. it can thus likely be used to monitor pain management for advanced cancer patients.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Background: Based on the promising results of eap (etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) combination, a phase ii study of modified eap combination was performed in patients with advanced gastric cancer to evaluate the response, toxicity, and survival. ## Method: Fifty-two consecutive patients
From February 1985 until January 1987, 108 consecutive patients with pain due to advanced cancer requiring parenteral narcotics were treated with a subcutaneous infusion of morphine (62 patients) or hydromorphone (46 patients). Mean maximal daily dose of morphine and hydromorphone was 305 mg (range,
## BACKGROUND. Communication between physicians and advanced cancer patients is frequently difficult. Patients often report poor levels of satisfaction with communication. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact on patients' recall of and overall satisfaction with their consultation by t
## Background. A prior Phase I1 study of a 100-mg/m2 dose of docetaxel conducted at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY) demonstrated a 38% response rate with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 76% of the patients and a grade 2 or greater rash or infusionrelated reaction in 41% and 3