๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A boundary crossing model of counterparty risk

โœ Scribed by Kian Esteghamat


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
490 KB
Volume
27
Category
Article
ISSN
0165-1889

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


This paper develops a market-implied credit score as a complement to internal and agency ratings. In its general form, the implied score is a multidimensional process whose passage through regions in space signals di erent credit events. The model o ers analytical tractability and the exibility to handle complex contract structures including, for example, claims with payo s that are dependent on multiple credit events and multiple contracting parties. A numerical example on pricing Republic of Argentina bonds and credit derivatives tests the feasibility of the model. The study shows how to overcome several practical challenges of using structural models.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A cross-diffusion model of forest bounda
โœ Yu. A. Kuznetsov; M. Ya. Antonovsky; V. N. Biktashev; E. A. Aponina ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1994 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 619 KB

A simple mathematical model of mono-species forest with two age classes which takes into account seed production and dispersal is presented in the paper. This reaction -diffusion type model is then reduced by means of an asymptotic procedure to a lower dimensional reaction -cross-diffusion model. Th

Estimating the relative recurrence risk
โœ Chris Wallace; David Clayton ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2003 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 141 KB

## Abstract The relative recurrence risk ratio ฮป~__R__~ (and particularly the sibling recurrence risk ratio, ฮป~__S__~ ) is often of interest to those wanting to quantify the genetic contribution towards risk of disease or to discriminate between different genetic models. However, estimating ฮป~__R__

Boundary crossing in research literature
โœ Pierce, Sydney J. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 95 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

Contemporary models of interdisciplinary information transfer treat disciplines as such sharply bounded groups that boundary-crossing publication (contributions to disciplinary literatures authored by researchers from other disciplines) should be very difficult, if not impossible. Yet boundary-cross