𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A bleeding controversy: Duties and decisions in the face of conflicting advice

✍ Scribed by Nawal Bahal; Andrew Papanikitas; Daniel K. Sokol

Book ID
118458112
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
99 KB
Volume
8
Category
Article
ISSN
1743-9191

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Distributive Justice and Rationing in th
Distributive Justice and Rationing in the NHS: Framing Effects in Press Coverage of a Controversial Decision
✍ CAROLE B. BURGOYNE πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 171 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Despite moves towards more openness over the allocation of treatment in the National Health Service (NHS), the public remains dependent upon the media for most of its information. This paper concerns the issue of rationing and how this was represented in newspaper articles following a controversial

RESEARCH DECISIONS IN THE FACE OF HETERO
RESEARCH DECISIONS IN THE FACE OF HETEROGENEITY: WHAT CAN A NEW STUDY TELL US?
✍ Nicky Welton; A. E. Ades πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 88 KB

## SUMMARY Willan and Eckermann describe a method for dealing with heterogeneity in value of information (VOI) calculations for prioritising and designing new research. Their article raises three fundamental (inter‐related) issues for VOI methods: (1) how to make sense of the concept of uncertainty