3016): on page 290, the second paragraph ``We shall prove ... in R'' should read ``We shall prove ... in R, and the restriction of f on R is not a permutation of R.''. In the third paragraph, ``[r]'' should be read as ``R'' and ``[r+s]'' as ``R \_ [n+1, ..., n+s].''
A Bijective Proof of Lassalle's Partition Identity
β Scribed by Jiang Zeng
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 77 KB
- Volume
- 89
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0097-3165
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
We give bijective proofs of the Hook-Schur function analogues of two well-known identities of Littlewood. In the course of our proof, we propose a new correspondence which can be considered as a generalization of the Burge correspondences used in proving the Littlewood identities.
This paper highlights three known identities, each of which involves sums over alternating sign matrices. While proofs of all three are known, the only known derivations are as corollaries of difficult results. The simplicity and natural combinatorial interpretation of these identities, however, sug
In this paper we give a computer proof of a new polynomial identity, which extends a recent result of Alladi and the first author. In addition, we provide computer proofs for new finite analogs of Jacobi and Euler formulas. All computer proofs are done with the aid of the new computer algebra packag