## Abstract A general Bayesian approach to combining __n__ expert forecasts is developed. Under some moderate assumptions on the distributions of the expert errors, it leads to a consistent, monotonic, quasiβlinear average formula. This generalizes Bordley's results.
A Bayesian approach to estimating benefits of improved forecasts
β Scribed by Hauke L. Kite-Powell; Andrew R. Solow
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 359 KB
- Volume
- 1
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1350-4827
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
W e describe a Bayesian approach to estimating the economic benefits f r o m improved forecasts. The approach takes explicit account of how decision makers use forecast information, and can provide more reliable estimates of benefits than methods based on mitigated impacts. W e discuss some practical considerations in applying the approach to weather and climate forecasts, and describe the results of an application to ENSO prediction.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The standard approach to combining n expert forecasts involves taking a weighted average. Granger and Ramanathan proposed introducing an intercept term and unnormalized weights. This paper deduces their proposal from Bayesian principles. We find that their formula is equivalent to taking a weighted
Let Yi -N(Bi, o?), i = 1, . . . , p, be independently distributed, where Bi and of are unknown. A Bayesian approach is used to estimate the first two moments of the minimum order statistic, W = min( Y I , . . . , Y,). In order to compute the Bayes estimates, one has to evaluate the predictive densit
## Abstract Inaccurate genetic (__or linkage__) maps can reduce the power to detect linkage, increase type I error, and distort haplotype and relationship inference. To improve the accuracy of existing maps, I propose a metaβanalysisβbased method that combines independent map estimates into a singl
## Abstract The objective of this study was to develop methods to estimate the optimal threshold of a longitudinal biomarker and its credible interval when the diagnostic test is based on a criterion that reflects a dynamic progression of that biomarker. Two methods are proposed: one parametric and