✦ LIBER ✦

99/02226 Comparative evaluation of ATS Method 1, the Ontario-Hydro method and EPA Method 29 for capture and analysis of mercury species: McManus, T. J. et al. Proc., Annu. Meet. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 1997, 90, WA72A08, 1–15

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1999
Weight: 428 KB
Volume: 40
Category: Article
ISSN: 0140-6701
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6701(99)97996-1

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

99/01997 A comparative evaluation of EPA

99/01997 A comparative evaluation of EPA Method 29 and the Ontario-Hydro method for capture and analysis of mercury species by ATS and three other research laboratories: Khosah, R. P. et al. Proc., Annu. Meet. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 1996, 89, wa64a03/1-wa64a03/20

📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 216 KB

99/02228 Comparison of mercury speciatio

99/02228 Comparison of mercury speciation results obtained with the US EPA Method 29 and the Ontario hydro technologies sampling methods at a sub-bituminous coal-fired power plant: Curtis, K. E. and Lucas, F. Proc., Annu. Meet. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 1997, 90, WP72B06, 1–14

📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 217 KB

75 Environment (pollution, health, protection, safety) conducting comparative bench-scale and pilot-scale evaluations of several mercury sampling methods to determine their capability to selectively isolate and retain various mercury species.