98/01728 Modelling biomass gasification units: Esposito, V. and Di Blasi, C. Biomass Energy Environ., Proc. Eur. Bioenergy Conf., 9th, 1996, 2, 1423–1428. Edited by Chartier, P., Elsevier, Oxford, UK
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1998
- Weight
- 397 KB
- Volume
- 39
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0140-6701
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
with harvesting biomass residues for heat generation at farm level in the UK, and (3) comparison of a wood fired and oil fired heating system at farm level in the UK. Generic data from other studies have been used for the valuation of environmental externalities. Direct and indirect economic effect
## 07 Alternative energy sources (bioconversion energy) properties of rice husk should be properly understood for the design of thermochemical conversion systems. This study provides information on moisture content, bulk density, particle size, heating values, proximate analysis, ultimate analysis,
content. This modified feedstock has an acceptable performance under catalytic cracking producing significant yields, compared to commercial FCC catalysts, of gasoline and low catalyst coking.
Direct and indirect economic effects are also taken into account. The economic benefits of biomass compared to coal are shown which can assist in overcoming a significant difference in production costs between the two. Comparing residue use for small scale heat production with advanced bio-energy sy