𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

786 Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Once-Only Screening for Colorectal Cancer With Colonoscopy or Computed Tomographic Colonography

✍ Scribed by Amy B. Knudsen; Chin Hur; Karen M. Kuntz; Ulrike Haug; G. Scott Gazelle

Book ID
119433376
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2012
Tongue
English
Weight
290 KB
Volume
142
Category
Article
ISSN
0016-5085

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer
Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography : The impact of not reporting diminutive lesions
✍ Perry J. Pickhardt; Cesare Hassan; Andrea Laghi; Angelo Zullo; David H. Kim; Ser πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 253 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND Prior cost‐effectiveness models analyzing computed tomography colonography (CTC) screening have assumed that patients with diminutive lesions (≀5 mm) will be referred to optical colonoscopy (OC) for polypectomy. However, consensus guidelines for CTC recommend reporting on

Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer
Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography : The impact of not reporting diminutive lesions
✍ Joseph Romagnuolo πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 38 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

W e were disappointed that many critical assumptions in the ar- ticle regarding the cost-effectiveness of computed tomography colonography (CTC) by Pickhardt et al. 1 are not in keeping with the literature, leading to incorrect conclusions. First, CTC accuracy for ''polyps'' is used, whereas the au