𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

584: The true risk of adverse pregnancy outcome following genetic amniocentesis

✍ Scribed by Andrzej Lysikiewicz; Adjua Yeboa; Lois Brustman; Richard Jaffe; Oded Langer

Book ID
113434609
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2008
Tongue
English
Weight
48 KB
Volume
199
Category
Article
ISSN
1097-6868

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Genetic amniocentesis: gestation-specifi
Genetic amniocentesis: gestation-specific pregnancy outcome and comparison of outcome following early and traditional amniocentesis
✍ E. C. Roper; J. C. Konje; R. C. De Chazal; D. P. Duckett; C. A. Oppenheimer; D. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 128 KB

Amniocentesis remains the most common prenatal diagnostic invasive procedure for fetal karyotyping. During counselling prior to this procedure miscarriage rates are often quoted as a single figure. In this review of 2924 amniocenteses, we report that miscarriage rates vary with the gestational age a

Genetic amniocentesis following multifet
Genetic amniocentesis following multifetal pregnancy reduction does not increase the risk of pregnancy loss
✍ Lynn K. McLean; Mark I. Evans; Robert J. Carpenter; Jr; Mark P. Johnson; James D πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 29 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

A collaborative, retrospective study of patients who had undergone multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR) to twins and subsequent genetic amniocentesis was performed to determine if amniocentesis increased the risk of pregnancy loss. Seventy-nine patients from three centres underwent MFPR and subsequ