𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR Angiography of the Head and Neck

✍ Scribed by DeLano, Mark C.; DeMarco, J. Kevin


Book ID
122016580
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
809 KB
Volume
16
Category
Article
ISSN
1052-5149

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


MR angiography of intracranial aneurysms
✍ Yukunori Korogi; Mutsumasa Takahashi; Nobuhisa Mabuchi; Tsuneya Watabe; Yoshiaki πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 621 KB

The objective of this paper is to compare the diagnostic efficacy of 3 DFf time-of-Bight MR angiography (MRA) at mid&-field-strength aud high-field-strength in diagnosis of intracranial aueurysms. Thirty-one patients, htcltu&g 26 pat&r@ with angiographically continned intracrauiaf aneurysms @I= 28),

3.0 T vs. 1.5 T MR angiography: In vitro
✍ Alexander Wall; Harald Kugel; Rainald Bachman; Lars Matuszewski; Stefan KrΓ€mer; πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2005 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 382 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose To evaluate the signal characteristics of different iliac artery stents in MR angiography (MRA) at 3 T in comparison with 1.5 T. ## Materials and Methods Sixteen iliac artery stents were implanted in plastic tubes filled with a solution of Gd‐DTPA and imaged at 3 T and 1.5