✦ LIBER ✦

3-D- versus 2-D-Implantatplanung

✍ Scribed by PD Dr. H.-J. Nickenig M.Sc.

Book ID: 118818916
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Year: 2012
Weight: 816 KB
Volume: 6
Category: Article
ISSN: 1863-2637
DOI: 10.1007/s11838-012-0150-y

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Thymic microenvironments, 3-D versus 2-D

Thymic microenvironments, 3-D versus 2-D?

✍ Willem van Ewijk; BaoPing Wang; Georg Hollander; Hiroshi Kawamoto; Eugenia Spano 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 201 KB

2-D versus 3-D cell counting – a debate

✍ Mark J West; Lutz Slomanka 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 16 KB

Bladder volume determination: Portable 3

Bladder volume determination: Portable 3-D versus stationary 2-D ultrasound device

✍ Peter Schnider; Peter Birner; Alexandra Gendo; Klaus Ratheiser; Eduard Auff 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 171 KB

P25.07: Corpus calosum abnormalities: 2D

P25.07: Corpus calosum abnormalities: 2D versus 3D multiplanar versus 3D-VCI

✍ C. Ionescu; D. Gheorghiu; I. Pacu; M. Dimitriu; E. Bratila 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 48 KB

Accuracy of 2-D versus 3-D ultrasound in

Accuracy of 2-D versus 3-D ultrasound in measurement of cervical length

✍ B.J. Stegmann; A. Saftlas; A. Olson; K.A. Ault; S. Baldus; C. Syrop 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 44 KB

Preparation of 2-D-, 3-D- and 4-D-phenol

✍ T. Pedersen; N. W. Larsen 📂 Article 📅 1969 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French ⚖ 104 KB

In connection with our microwave investigations of phenol, all the monodeuteriophenols with deuterium at the ring atoms were prepared, and their purity established by PMR and IR-spectroscopy. 2-D, 3-D AND 4-D-PHENOL.