✦ LIBER ✦

2D multislice and 3D MRI sequences are often equally sensitive

✍ Scribed by Glyn Johnson; Youssef Zain Wadghiri; Daniel H. Turnbull

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1999
Tongue: English
Weight: 93 KB
Volume: 41
Category: Article
ISSN: 0740-3194
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(199904)41:4<824::aid-mrm23>3.0.co;2-1

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comparison between 2D and 3D gradient-ec

Comparison between 2D and 3D gradient-echo sequences for MRI of human lung ventilation with hyperpolarized 3He

✍ Jim M. Wild; Neil Woodhouse; Martyn N.J. Paley; Stan Fichele; Zead Said; Larry K 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 434 KB

## Abstract Images of hyperpolarized ^3^He were acquired during breath‐hold in four healthy volunteers with the use of an optimized 3D gradient‐echo sequence. The images were compared with existing 2D gradient‐echo methods. The average SNR from a 13‐mm‐thick slice in the peripheral lung was 1.4 tim

Delayed contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI at

Delayed contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI at an open 1.0T MR-system comparison of conventional segmented 3D gradient echo and phase-sensitive inversion recovery sequences: initial results

✍ Ortrud Kosiek; Frank Fischbach; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Alexander Schmeisser; Ja 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 BioMed Central 🌐 English ⚖ 213 KB

Enhanced sensitivity with fast three-dim

Enhanced sensitivity with fast three-dimensional blood-oxygen-level-dependent functional MRI: comparison of SENSE–PRESTO and 2D-EPI at 3 T

✍ Sebastiaan F. W. Neggers; Erno J. Hermans; Nick F. Ramsey 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 628 KB

Phase-sensitive, dual-acquisition, singl

Phase-sensitive, dual-acquisition, single-slab, 3D, turbo-spin-echo pulse sequence for simultaneous T2-weighted and fluid-attenuated whole-brain imaging

✍ Jaeseok Park; Suhyung Park; Eung Yeop Kim; Jin-Suck Suh 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 584 KB

## Abstract Conventional __T__~2~‐weighted turbo/fast spin echo imaging is clinically accepted as the most sensitive method to detect brain lesions but generates a high signal intensity of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), yielding diagnostic ambiguity for lesions close to CSF. Fluid‐attenuated inversion