𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

21A How clinical trial results are desseminated: use and influence of different sources of information in a survey of US physicians

✍ Scribed by Yves Rosenberg; Eleanor Schron; Albert Parker

Book ID
113297987
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1994
Tongue
English
Weight
41 KB
Volume
15
Category
Article
ISSN
0197-2456

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

How reminders given to patients and phys
How reminders given to patients and physicians affected pap smear use in a health maintenance organization : Results of a randomized controlled trial
✍ Robert C. Burack; Phyllis A. Gimotty; Julie George; Scott McBride; Anita Moncrea πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 103 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Background: Despite its effectiveness as a method of controlling cervical carcinoma, the use of pap smear testing remains incomplete, and its promotion in the primary care setting provides an important opportunity for intervention. ## Methods: The authors conducted a randomized controlled tria

How do physician assessments of patient
How do physician assessments of patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests differ from actual preferences? A comparison in Canada and the United States using a stated-choice survey
✍ Deborah A. Marshall; F. Reed Johnson; Nathalie A. Kulin; Semra Γ–zdemir; Judith M πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 222 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract __Background__: Patient preferences can affect colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test use. We compared utility‐based preferences for alternative CRC screening tests from a stated‐preference discrete‐choice survey of the general population and physicians in Canada and the United States.