𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

18F-FDG-PET/CT versus panendoscopy for the detection of synchronous second primary tumors in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

✍ Scribed by Stephan K. Haerle; Klaus Strobel; Thomas F. Hany; Daniel Sidler; Sandro J. Stoeckli


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
125 KB
Volume
32
Category
Article
ISSN
1043-3074

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Background.

This study assesses the additional value of ^18^F‐fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐D‐glucose positron emission tomography/CT (^18^F‐FDG‐PET/CT) with respect to synchronous primaries in patients undergoing panendoscopy for staging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods.

In all, 311 patients underwent both modalities. Cytology, histology, and/or clinical/imaging follow‐up served as reference standard.

Results.

The prevalence of second primary tumors detected by panendoscopy was 4.5%, compared with 6.1% detected by ^18^F‐FDG‐PET/CT. The sensitivity for panendoscopy was 74%, the specificity was 99.7%, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 93%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 98%. The sensitivity for ^18^F‐FDG‐PET/CT was 100%, the specificity was 95.7%, the PPV was 59%, and the NPV was 100%.

Conclusions.

^18^F‐FDG‐PET/CT is superior to panendoscopy. With a negative ^18^F‐FDG‐PET/CT, the extent of endoscopy can be reduced to the area of the primary tumor. Due to the costs, ^18^F‐FDG‐PET/CT is recommended only in advanced disease to assess potential distant disease. In early‐stage cancer, panendoscopy is accurate enough to rule out secondary tumors. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2010


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Detection of synchronous lung tumors in
✍ Samit K. Ghosh; Nicholas J. Roland; Aman Kumar; Sankalap Tandon; Jeffrey L. Lanc 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 157 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract ## __Background.__ Screening for synchronous pulmonary tumors in patients presenting with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is important, because detection may alter subsequent management. ## __Methods.__ We conducted a retrospective review, comparing effectiveness

Detection of cervical metastases with 11
✍ Christiaan A. Krabbe; Gerreke van der Werff-Regelink; Jan Pruim; Jacqueline E. v 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 115 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## Background. A disadvantage of 2‐[^18^F]fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐D‐glucose (^18^F‐FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in head and neck cancer is that ^18^F‐FDG uptake is not specific to malignant tissue. To provide an alternative, radiolabeled amino acids such as L‐1‐[^11^C]‐tyrosine (^11^

Clinical utility of PET/CT in the evalua
✍ Luke Rudmik; Harold Y. Lau; T. Wayne Matthews; J. Douglas Bosch; Reinhard Kloibe 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 206 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## Background Metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with an unknown primary is an uncommon but important problem. PET/CT, as an adjunct to diagnosis, is potentially useful but has never been studied in a prospective, single‐blinded clinical trial. ## Methods In all, 20 sub